![]() Lately, such assertions are coming from some authorities on Israel's archaeology, who speak from the perspective of recent finds from excavations into the ancient past. ![]() ![]() Yet what if the Bible's account doesn't fit the evidence in the ground? What if David's Jerusalem was really a rural backwater - and the greatness of Israel and Judah lay far in the future? Thus began a glorious era, later amplifiedīy his son, King Solomon, whose influence extended from the borders of Egypt to the Euphrates River. He Bible's account of King David is so well known that even people who rarely crack the Good Book probably have an idea of his greatness.ĭavid, Scripture says, was such a superb military leader that he not only captured Jerusalem but also went on to make it the seat of an empire, uniting the kingdoms of Judah and Israel. Join a Discussion on Archaeology and Anthropology.Issue in Depth: Archaeology, Anthropology and Paleontology.The Bible, as History, Flunks New Archaeological Tests By GUSTAV NIEBUHRĪrchaeologists working at excavation sites like Megiddo in northern Israel, above, say that no evidence has been found to confirm biblical stories about a united monarchy ruling over a large area from Jerusalem or about the wanderings of the Jews in the The Bible, as History, Flunks New Archaeological Tests ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |